When (and How) to Use Tamper-Evident Labels

Talk to a Compliance Consultant →

The real question isn’t whether to use tamper-evident labels—it’s whether they’ll work when it matters. In regulated industries, success lives in the execution: choose the wrong construction, place the label poorly, or skip real-world testing, and you’re setting yourself up for failure.

As a St. Louis–based, compliance-focused team, we here at Systems Graphics know our way around labels—what works, what doesn’t, and how to parse them out. This article provides a practical playbook for getting it right—when tamper evidence is essential, what specifications matter, and how to validate performance. Don’t let audits or customers expose the gaps.

AVOID COSTLY TAMPER FAILURES—CONSULT AN EXPERT

Tamper-Evident Labels Are Not One-Size-Fits-All

The same construction that flags tampering on a pharmaceutical bottle might fall short on a textured food pouch or an industrial drum. The variables—substrate, lighting, temperature, user handling—can change everything.

At Systems Graphics, we help teams avoid overgeneralized solutions by tailoring materials, adhesives, and label design to the environment the product will actually live in. That includes distribution stress, consumer use, sterilization, and even point-of-sale lighting.

Tamper evidence only works when it’s obvious, reliable, and resistant to failure—without impeding function. Here are some basics you should know:

Typical Construction Types

Tamper-evident labels use mechanical or visual disruption to signal any prior interference before customer use. But the right construction depends on your application:

• Void-revealing films leave behind a visible message (“VOID,” checkerboard, or custom pattern) when lifted. These work best on smooth, non-porous surfaces like glass or rigid plastic, where adhesive contact is consistent.
• Destructible materials tear, fragment, or delaminate under removal attempts. These are ideal for high-value or high-security applications, where even partial removal should trigger an alert.
• Security slits or cuts feature pre-engineered weak points that cause tearing upon removal. These offer a balance of tamper evidence and clean application, customizable by depth and pattern for different force thresholds.
• Dual-layer constructions combine multiple mechanisms, such as a destructible top layer over a void adhesive. These are best used when redundancy is needed—but they come with some added cost and complexity.

However you feel about these solutions upfront, remember: no single mechanism is universally superior. Strategic labeling means matching tamper-evident labels to the appropriate threat models, specific packaging materials, and expected handling conditions.

High-Stakes Applications for Tamper-Evident Labels

Not all industries and products call for tamper-evident labeling, and that’s a good thing—but it’s never a bad idea to err on the safe side. There are some markets where tamper-evident features are optional, and some where they’re unquestionably mandatory. Even when not required by law, they often serve as a critical brand protection measure:

• Pharmaceuticals: The FDA mandates tamper-evident packaging for most OTC drugs, and prescription drugs increasingly include these features as part of serialization and supply chain integrity. Importantly, they must visibly alert the end user to tampering under ordinary use.
• Nutritional and Food Products: Infant formula, supplements, and specialty foods often use tamper-evident bands, closures, or labels. The challenge is maintaining functionality through shipping, refrigeration, and shelf life while staying consumer-friendly.
• Consumer Electronics: Tamper-evident labels can also be used to deter theft and prevent warranty fraud. These often prioritize immediate visual disruption during attempted removal.
• Industrial Chemicals: High-stress environments (excess heat, chemical exposure, outdoor storage) often demand tamper-evident solutions that can survive conditions most consumer products never face.

Whether driven by regulation, litigation risk, or brand integrity, the pressure to get tamper evidence right is real. Fortunately, there are plenty of solutions available for your brand.

Material Selection: Where Evidence Holds or Fails

Labels only tell the truth if the materials cooperate. You may see some labels that claim tamper evidence but break down under everyday conditions. Why? Oftentimes, because material compatibility was an afterthought. To avoid this, consider factors like:

• Adhesive-substrate match: Void adhesives work beautifully on glass but may not bond fully on textured plastics or low-energy surfaces. When testing, use the actual packaging under real conditions.
• Face stock contrast: For void messages or fragmenting effects to stand out, the face stock color must offer contrast and retain its integrity after exposure to light, heat, or solvents.
• Environmental stability: Labels exposed to UV light, refrigeration, or sterilization must retain both adhesive performance and evidence visibility.
• Print compatibility: Some tamper-evident stocks resist thermal transfer or inkjet printing—limiting your options for barcodes, serialization, or branding. When in doubt, consult with your label converter.

Design Integration for Optimal Usability

Effective integration is part engineering, part user experience—and it starts by asking not just where a label will go, but how it will be encountered and handled throughout the product’s lifecycle. Placement and sizing need to be thought through early in the packaging development process.

Tamper-evident features are only effective if they work in harmony with the overall packaging design. Labels placed across closures can deliver excellent security, but if they interfere with the consumer’s ability to open the product cleanly, they risk becoming a frustration—or worse, an incentive to bypass the feature entirely. 

Compliance: Not Just the Right Label, But the Right Process

Having a tamper-evident label on your package isn’t always enough to meet regulatory expectations on its own. Compliance requires a documented, validated system—one that demonstrates both technical effectiveness and practical implementation. 

Labels must be tested under realistic conditions—and for regulated industries, that testing should be backed by detailed specifications, certifications, and protocols. 

Beyond the label itself, many organizations also overlook the importance of consumer communication. If end users don’t understand what tamper evidence looks like—or where to find it—they’re unlikely to notice a breach. In short, compliance isn’t just a materials challenge; it’s a systems challenge.

The Common Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)

In the same way, most tamper-evident failures we see aren’t material problems, but system problems. Here are some areas where implementation tends to break down, as well as some best practices to help you avoid the same issues:

• Inadequate real-world testing: Controlled conditions are useful, but they don’t replicate warehouse heat, refrigerated trucking, or international shipping. Be thorough!
• Wrong material for the substrate: Even “proven” constructions can fail on unfamiliar surfaces. Run compatibility tests on your actual packaging.
• Insufficient operator training: Many tamper-evident materials need specific application parameters—pressure, dwell time, or temperature—to function properly. A poorly applied label may lose adhesion or fail to activate its security feature.
• Lack of incident procedures: Even the best label won’t help if your team doesn’t know what to do when tampering is suspected. Clear protocols ensure that any breach triggers the right investigation, reporting, and containment steps.

Smarter Security, Built In

Remember that two-pronged success model we talked about? Tamper-evident labels are as much a safeguard against interference as they are a signal to your customers, your partners, and your regulators that your brand takes security seriously. But effective tamper evidence doesn’t come from a catalog—it comes from matching label materials, adhesives, and construction methods to your specific product conditions. 

At Systems Graphics, we partner with manufacturers to build tamper-evident strategies that work in the real world, from material selection to in-line print compatibility. If you’re ready to strengthen your product’s first line of defense, we’re ready to help.

Get in touch with the Systems Graphics team to explore custom-engineered solutions that support your compliance, production, and product integrity goals.